AP Chemistryhardmcq1 pt

Water climbs a clean glass capillary tube with a concave meniscus, while mercury in glass shows a convex meniscus depressed at the center. What comparison of forces explains the contrast?

A.Water's adhesion to glass exceeds its cohesion, while mercury's cohesion exceeds its adhesion to glass
B.Water's greater density presses it harder against the tube walls
C.Gravity pulls on water but not on mercury inside narrow tubes
D.Glass repels water molecules but attracts mercury atoms

Explanation

Core Concept

Meniscus shape records the tug-of-war at the liquid-solid boundary. Polar glass hydrogen-bonds to water, so molecules at the wall feel a stronger upward adhesive pull than sideways cohesive pull, curling the surface upward and driving capillary rise. Mercury atoms bind each other strongly but adhere poorly to silicon dioxide, so cohesion dominates and the surface domes downward. Whichever force wins locally dictates whether the edge climbs or sinks.

Correct Answer

AWater's adhesion to glass exceeds its cohesion, while mercury's cohesion exceeds its adhesion to glass

More Unit 3: Intermolecular Forces and Properties practice questions

Try a random question →

Practice more AP Chemistry questions with full explanations

Practice Unit 3: Intermolecular Forces and Properties Questions →